This is essentially a senior client-facing managed services role, responsible for a portfolio of live Civica systems after they have been implemented—for example, DORS.
They are not managing the original build programme. They are making sure the ongoing service is stable, meets its contractual SLAs, keeps the customer satisfied and remains commercially profitable.
What are they actually responsible for?
They will sit between:
- The Central Government customer
- Civica’s Service Desk and technical Service Engineers
- Suppliers and offshore teams
- Civica’s commercial, finance and sales teams
- More junior Service Delivery Managers, where applicable
Typical responsibilities would include:
- Leading customer service reviews
- Reporting on incidents, SLAs, risks, service performance and improvements
- Acting as the senior escalation point when the Service Desk or engineering teams cannot resolve something
- Coordinating technical teams rather than personally fixing AWS or Azure issues
- Managing service finances, invoicing, renewals and profitability
- Transitioning new functionality or projects into business-as-usual support
- Pricing smaller enhancements and change requests of up to £150,000
- Making sure holidays, sickness and resource gaps do not affect service delivery
It is therefore a mixture of service delivery, account management, operational governance and commercial management.
Who are they managing?
The specification is slightly contradictory.
The hiring notes say:
No direct line management in the role.
But the generic job description repeatedly refers to:
- Line management of Service Delivery Managers
- Managing teams of Service Engineers
- Approving timesheets
- Managing absences
- Reviewing reports produced by other SDMs
My interpretation is that the hiring manager’s note should take priority. For this particular vacancy, they probably do not currently have permanent direct reports.
They will still be expected to:
- Matrix-manage Service Engineers and technical resources
- Coordinate people allocated to their services
- Guide or mentor less experienced Service Delivery Managers
- Challenge teams when service performance drops
- Potentially cover some senior oversight of other SDMs
So I would describe it as significant operational leadership without necessarily having a formal team reporting into them.
I would not discount someone without formal line-management experience, as long as they have successfully led technical teams through influence and matrix management.
Why do they need ITIL?
ITIL is relevant because this is about managing a live production service in a structured way.
They need to understand areas such as:
- Incident and major incident management
- Problem management
- Change management
- Service transition
- Continual service improvement
- Service-level management
- Escalation processes
- Service reviews and reporting
They do not necessarily need to recite ITIL terminology or be an ITIL expert. However, they need to understand how a managed service should operate and how incidents, changes and service improvements are governed.
The qualification is only preferred. Strong practical experience in an ITIL-aligned MSP or software support environment should be more important than holding the certificate.
The profile I would target
I would look for someone from an IT services company, MSP, government supplier or software vendor who has managed several externally contracted services.
The key experience is:
- Public-sector or regulated customer management
- SC clearance
- Owning live application or cloud-based managed services
- Strong SLA and service-review experience
- Senior customer escalation management
- Matrix leadership of engineers
- Service transition from projects into BAU
- Financial and commercial ownership
- Enough AWS or Azure understanding to hold credible conversations with engineers and customers
The cloud point sounds deliberately light-touch. They are not looking for a cloud engineer. They want someone who understands what engineers are discussing and can manage a cloud-hosted service credibly.
In one line: they need someone who can act as the accountable owner of several live Civica customer services, keeping the customer, technical delivery and commercial performance under control.